CO129-378 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [6-7] — Page 92

proposed that

warrant

syned ya

consuler officer shall alone be sufficient

suce

to commit him by the clause which make,

the magistrate

can show cause

Ove deleted.

ach the prisoner if he

against committal is

This proposal

unnecessay; that it is

but such

my

seems quite

of the A.G. argues not a matter of extradition,

420 no

investigation need

be made, lutsurdly evey.

modem state.

through whome a prisoner passes

& exenises

claim

to make sure

the right lawfully detained, and

that he is lawfell

if

the prisoner is not allowed to speak

seminity. The statute

there is no

it is state that the warant Drgned

a

consular officer is

ove

efficient evidence of lawful detection;

1

I dot see that

the procedure

receway;

S.

ད

5.

an

a

further implication

it now exist

? Sauction butine that the cannot affrove of sext 2(c) mus the refealed.

2(d) a that they

RAW 14/7

ts, and Still

in the com

Acors

M. Risley:

Having

бригати

un

Seen

4030

1914

89

interesting

thund

your

it is quite

trav

that this Ordinance would, if allowed to

Stand

pronsion

of the provision,

Thaits which is If restrictid at

This to a curtain.

Ichor of "forei

offenders but apples

cut arrang

the

most important

the

Phe

The 1872 Ordinance,

in fact, which justipes

Existence of that law.

I Therefore

conce

in

Mr. Wiseman's

to all to but the recommendation (not friding any

that

soft-quam is als

to wa

in the tranti

Affection

2

law to subsectionis (^) +(6) to sect. Ordinance); but, having regard The

the importance of discountenancing

prociples involved

1

of section 2

in

the

ما

subsections (c) (d)

dould suggest

? That the Garmor be directed

ama

lenderen

LH.M..

Que

to

mo

canor those subsections to be repeded,

that panding such repeal adnice bi The attorance of this Orshnance.

...vi

ham Cother

un fildes.

Dr.

15

Aic

7h

Hil My opt for contraher

ity